Skip to main content

Week 5 Assignment - Observation reflection


With my niece and nephew, although they were constantly moving, I was able to follow them and noticed things in detail, such as clothing, facial expressions, and what they said and did. Having said that, I didn't remind myself as an observer. I interacted with them and the details were there in my head. I was able to notice changes, and make assumptions based on information I already had. 
When it came to strangers, I was more aware of my role as an observer. There was a lot going on at the same time, and I had to make a choice either following a specific person or switching between different people. Partly because they were only in sight for a short period of time, people with distinctive features stood out, and I wasn’t able to give everyone the same level of attention.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Research Ethics

Week 8 - Richard Fidler's interview with Ira Glass

This interview is unique in a way that Fidler interviewed another radio interviewer. The conversation can be roughly divided into the following three sections. Part 1 1. What was your first job in radio? Did you sort of accidentally backed into it in public radio? 2. How long did it take you to get good? 3. You're impersonating. It leaves you to feeling authentic. Is that what you think you were doing in this clip? 4. So who knocked that out of you? Did someone come along and just say ‘knock it off'? Did someone do that? Or did you just realise yourself that to actually start talking like a normal person? 5. Theory -- 10,000 hours to spend at anything to be seriously good. Do you think there's a similar kind of lesson there to you? 6. It's worse though if she's not mean, isn't it? The two of them were able to build on their shared experience, both being experienced interviewers, and eased into a conversation about Glass's journey as a radio interviewer. Usin...

Week 6 Guest speaker - Dr. Tathali Urueta

I like how she developed from the research questions in her Master’s thesis to the ones in her PhD. I wonder if it would make a difference had she not fostered a relationship with the children during the learning experiences? Coming from a science background without teaching experiences, it is amazing that she could work with a large number of children in interviews. As Katie mentioned in the QnA, what impact would it have on her interaction/experiences with the children? Were there any ethical consideration/restrictions that potentially hindered her interaction with the children? If so, how did she cope with them?